2. William Camden, Historie . (London, 1630), III, pp. 61-62; Jerome E. Brooks, Tobacco: their Background Represented . from the Collection off George Arents (5 vols., Ny, 1937-52), I, pp. 46-49; II, pp. 156-158; Roentgen. Letter. Salaman, A brief history and you will Public Influence of your own Potato (Cambridge, 1949), pp. 83-96; Quinn, Roanoke Voyages , We, pp. 344-348.
BIGGES, WALTER. A Summarie and you may True Commentary away from Sir Frances [sic] Drakes West Indian Voyage. (First-line from term and some statements trimmed.) With woodcut printer’s draw out-of Richard Industry toward title. cuatro will leave, 37 (1) pp., 1 blank leaf. Small quarto. Morocco.
Another ENGLISH Release, published a similar season just like the basic. Today’s Roger Ward release appears to be less infamous compared to Richard Profession model (STC 3056) and this preceded it an equivalent year–understand the earlier amount. STC-Bishop-Ramage to acquire just 4 copies of Ward model once the facing eleven of the Occupation. The current content comes with the leaf up until the title, blank except for the latest trademark-mark ”A good,” additionally the blank leaf in the bottom.
F.” try taken to sea with the February 4, 1589, for the true purpose of reconnoitering this new Iberian coasts when preparing to have the fresh Drake-Norris expedition out of 1589
STC 3057; Sabin 20841; Chapel 136 (note); Oceans (ed.), True and you can Perfecte Newes . Syr Frauncis Drake , pp. 53-70; Quinn, ed., The fresh new Roanoke Voyages , I, pp. 32-thirty-five.
”T. He gives reports of the future of your own Invincible Armada off the previous season: ”So when in regards to the last Fleete hledÃ¡nÃ profilu senior match, [a beneficial marchant away from Lisbone] sayth, that of all ships and you can carvels of your own Language Fleete you’ll find come home however, nine and you may thirtie. but the majority of all of the people you to arrived domestic died immediatly in the their obtaining. In addition to the Duke regarding Medina was banished the latest Court for good.” So it latter detail is quite false–Queen Philip don’t fault the newest Duke towards the incapacity regarding this new Armada strategy. The guy as well as brings ins and outs of an effective naval step out-of Lisbon within the and this good Greek boat packed with drink out-of Crete is actually seized, and you can predicts higher success to your upcoming attack.
(WINGFIELD, ANTHONY). A genuine Coppie off a discourse compiled by a gentleman, in the brand new late Voyage off Spaine and you will Portingale. dos actually leaves, 58 pp., 1 empty leaf. (Pp. 27-31 without having, supplied inside the photostat.) Woodcut vignette towards label. Quick quarto. Old chatrooms, leather-based straight back.
Very first Model, Very first Thing. Wingfield’s narrative is considered the most intricate membership extant of 1589 assault on the The country of spain asked because of the Sir Francis Drake and you will Sir John Norreys (Norris), and therefore sailed off Plymouth with the April 17, 1589, and you can came back later into the June. However, an unnumbered afterwards record gets Wingfield since the blogger. step 1
The latest journey were not successful within the dominant goal, the newest raising away from good rebellion in A holiday in greece facing King Philip II off The country of spain, and the enthroning out of Dom Antonio, the very last men offshoot of Aviz dynasty, when you look at the Philip’s put. They performed a lot of problems for Language naval shipments on Corunna, also some remnants of one’s Armada of your own prior year; as well as over 60 ships full of corn and you will naval supplies hence the new English regarded as contraband was basically pulled close Lisbon on the Hanse.
About STC the ebook is actually wrongly ascribed so you can King Elizabeth’s favourite, Robert Devereux, Earl out of Essex, which participated in new trip–far from the Queen’s commonly–as a volunteer
Two issues of this work are extant; signature E (pp. 25-32), which relates events of the attack upon Lisbon, in some copies (including this one) contains a passage in praise of the Earl of Essex on p. 26 (E
1 verso). As Queen Elizabeth was highly displeased with the Earl’s running off on this voyage against her orders, it is perhaps likely that the issue with the passage is the earlier of the two.